Effective and Enforceable Dispute Resolutions in U.S./Mexican Commercial Trade

The Houston Lawyer

Gardere Partners Geoffrey H. Bracken and Peter Scaff recently authored an article “Effective and Enforceable Dispute Resolution in U.S./Mexican Commercial Trade” for The Houston Lawyer.  Here is an excerpt from the article:

“Since the 1994 implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement, commerce has steadily increased between the signatory countries. The International Monetary Fund reports that total trade among the three NAFTA signatories has more than doubled, increasing from $306 billion in 1993 to almost $621 billion in 2002.1 As would be expected, increased trade brings greater pressure on these countries to provide effective and enforceable resolution of commercial disputes. For local practitioners, an increasing need exists to advise U.S. and Mexican clients regarding cross-border transactions.

…[Q]uestions confronted when U.S. and Mexican companies cross swords in a commercial dispute. Is litigation within the courts of either Mexico or the United States a viable option? If so, which forum is preferred? If the parties have contracted to resolve their disputes through arbitration, is the arbitration clause enforceable? And, perhaps most importantly, does the arbitration clause provide for a proceeding that will allow the eventual award to be enforced and collected in the relevant jurisdiction?"

The complete article can be viewed here.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top