The Future of Legal Education: Preparing Law Students to Be Great Lawyers

Oregon Law Review

For decades, many law school graduates have looked back at their legal education and concluded that they were not properly prepared to practice law. Consequently, from time to time, the American Bar Association (ABA) and other bar groups have studied how to change law school education. In fact, in 2009, the Association of Continuing Legal Education Administrators (ACLEA), the American Law Institute-American Bar Association (ALI-ABA), and a number of other organizations held a three-day discussion at Arizona State University on the future of legal education, the Critical Issues Summit. The event "brought together CLE professionals, law school deans and faculty members, law practitioners, bar leaders, judges, mandatory CLE administrators, law firm educators, and other experts on lawyer professional education to study and respond to the challenges of equipping lawyers to practice in a rapidly changing world." Among other things, the Critical Issues Summit produced a final report and sixteen recommendations addressing issues related to law school preparations for legal practice and legal training for lawyers after law school.

After the Critical Issues Summit, ACLEA established a Summit Issues Group in an effort to continue the dialogue about the future of training law students to practice law. This Article highlights key issues from the Critical Issues Summit that are particularly important to changing law school education today. Additionally, it offers suggestions that could further improve preparing students for the legal profession.


In the Sections that follow, I will describe specific portions of the Summit Recommendations and reflections I have had as a law student, lawyer, and adjunct law professor. Unlike most people who attend law school expecting to pursue legal careers, I went to law school never intending to practice law. Instead, I planned to pursue a career in IT consulting after law school, and therefore I taught graduate computer sciences while I studied law. While I became a sole practitioner and eventually went on to join a law firm, my computer science and legal background have given me particular insight into IT legal matters. Further, as an adjunct law professor, I have had the wonderful opportunity to teach a variety of courses on IT legal matters and share my experience with hundreds of students, many of whom I keep in touch with, and I have even practiced law with some former students. As a result, I am also able to offer a unique perspective on how the Summit Recommendations may be helpful to legal education for law students based on my experiences and students' input.

Read more.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top