Appellate Attorney Stacy Obenhaus Talks Litigation with Law360


Law360 interviewed Appellate Attorney Stacy R. Obenhaus of Gardere's Dallas office. Among Law360's most well-received content, Law360 Q&As offer practice leaders at top law firms the opportunity to share their experience and insight. An excerpt may be viewed below.

Q&A with Gardere's Stacy Obenhaus

Q: What is the most challenging case you have worked on and what made it challenging?

A: I drafted the jury charge – and argued the objections at the charge conference – in a multiplaintiff strict products liability lawsuit several years ago in Marin County, California. There were two challenges: the potential applicability of several other states' laws to the liability and damages issues for several plaintiffs (who resided in other states at the time of injury), and my own unfamiliarity with the protocols for the jury charge in the California state courts.

At the end of the day, we jettisoned the rather unwieldy pattern jury charge forms of that jurisdiction and decided to just do it the way we do it here in Texas – because we do everything better in Texas, right? We got the charge we wanted – simple broad-form special interrogatories strictly under California law – and my Firm's trial lawyers got a "no liability" verdict. Nothing like having great trial lawyers to back you up.

Subscribers can access the full Q&A here.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top