Gardere Partner Marshall Doke Testifies on Government Contracts to Senate Subcommittee


Marshall Doke Jr., a partner in the Dallas office of Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP and one of the nation's preeminent government contracts lawyers, testified on Thursday, Feb. 25, before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Subcommittee on Contracting Oversight.

The hearing was held to assess the need for increased oversight and reform of interagency contracting, which has grown dramatically in recent years.

Mr. Doke was one of two private practice lawyers on the 14-member Federal Acquisition Advisory Panel, established under the Services Acquisition Reform Act.

"The Panel concluded that most of the interagency contracting problems have resulted from an uncoordinated, bottoms-up, statutory and regulatory approach focusing on short-term benefits of reduced procurement lead times instead of as a tool for government-wide strategic sourcing with reduced administrative costs," Mr. Doke told subcommittee members. "The Panel recommended the development of a government-wide policy that requires agencies to address all relevant issues at the point of creation and continuation of these contract vehicles rather than trying to fix them at their point of use."

Mr. Doke cited a March 4, 2009, memo from President Obama stating that spending on government contracts has more than doubled since 2001, reaching more than $500 billion in 2008.

"Merely adding 'sunlight' and transparency to the price premiums being paid would, I believe, have a significant impact in slowing additional growth," Mr. Doke said. He recommended legislation requiring contracting officers report "up the chain" the amounts of these price premiums, which are the amounts the government pays exceeding the price of other acceptable offers based on non-price factors.

Mr. Doke has served as chairman of the American Bar Association's Section of Public Contract Law, president of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association, president of the Boards of Contract Appeals Bar Association, and was a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Circuit Bar Association.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top