IoT Wearables Lawsuit! Jawbone Accuses Fitbit of Stealing Trade Secrets


Jawbone alleges that "beginning in early 2015, Fitbit recruiters contacted an estimated 30 percent of Jawbone's workforce" and "Fitbit's objective is to decimate Jawbone." The New York Times reported that Jawbone is '…accusing its rival of "systematically plundering" confidential information by hiring Jawbone employees who improperly downloaded sensitive materials shortly before leaving."

The May 27, 2015 Complaint filed in the Superior Court of San Francisco of Aliphcom, Inc. dba Jawbone v. Fitbit, Inc. et al includes these allegations:

…forensic analyses performed by Jawbone on its former employees' computer devices revealed that a number of the departed employees used USB thumb drives in their last days of employment at Jawbone to steal proprietary company information, and in other cases forwarded confidential company information to personal email addresses for later use.

The stolen files are the informational equivalent of a gold mine for Fitbit, as they provide an intricate roadmap into the core of Jawbone's business, including such information as Jawbone's supply chain, gross margins, product lineup (both current and future), product target costs, vendor contract, product analysis, market trends and predictions, and the future direction of Fitbit's main competitor.

The Complaint includes these causes of action:

  1. Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
  2. Breach of Contract
  3. Breach of Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and
  4. Unfair and Unlawful Business Practices (California Business & Professional Code 17200 et seq)

Theft of trade secrets allegations are very old news in the technology market, but this lawsuit should be an eye opening case for all companies about recruiting employees from competitors.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top