EU Antitrust Claims Plague Google


Search engine competitors in the EU released an e-konomica report critical of Google’s October 2013 settlement offer claiming it provides “a way for the company to grow its advertising revenues by increasing paid advertising space and decreasing space dedicated to organic search results.”  The Wall Street Journal reports that Google accounts for about 90% of the EU searches which led to anti competitive complaints 3 years ago by Google’s EU competitors which include a group led by Microsoft known as the Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace (ICOMP).  In December 2013 ICOMP released the e-konomica report, and ICOMP’s attorney David Wood made this comment about Google’s settlement offer:

These proposals cleverly disguise a new revenue stream as a solution to its market dominance.

Computerworld reported that EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia told Spanish radio station Radio Nacional de EspaA+-a that Google settlement offer is “…not acceptable in the sense that they are not proposals that can eliminate our concerns regarding competition and in particular regarding the way Google’s rivals in vertical search are being treated.”

Nonetheless the Wall Street Journal reported that “Commissioner Joaquin Almunia has said that he still hopes to reach a settlement by next spring.”  Google and the EU would prefer a settlement since otherwise Google could be fined “10 percent of its annual global revenue.”

Although this EU antitrust action is moving slowly, it is important to follow since the consequences to Google could be enormous.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top