Sending Text Messages in New Jersey Creates Liability


 A court ruled that “the sender of a text message can potentially be liable if an accident is caused by texting, but only if the sender knew or had special reason to know that the recipient would view the text while driving and thus be distracted.” Although the New Jersey appellate court ruled that there was insufficient evidence at trial that the person sending text knew that the recipient of the text was driving, the court nonetheless adopted the following standard in Kubert v. Best:

...when a texter knows or has special reason to know that the intended recipient is driving and is likely to read the text message while driving, the texter has a duty to users of the public roads to refrain from sending the driver a text at that time.

The 17 year old remote texter in this case sent over 180 text messages the day of the accident to her 18 year old boyfriend who caused the plaintiffs (husband and wife) to each lose their legs after the distracted defendant crossed the middle of the road. The 17 year old third party defendant confessed that her habit was to text more than 100 times per day:

I’m a young teenager. That’s what we do.

....she generally did not pay attention to whether the recipient of her texts was driving a car at the time or not

This new standard of liability for texters set in New Jersey will likely be established in other states now that texting while driving is illegal in so many states.


The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top