Invasion of Privacy by Google, Facebook, & Apple?


Initial reports that Verizon provided phone data has expanded and now includes “Internet surveillance ...including e-mail, chat services, videos, photos, stored data, file transfers, video conferencing and log-ins” as reported by the New York Times as part of PRISM under federal oversight by the National Security Agency (NSA) and the FBI. Based on reports from the UK Guardian the PRISM system included PowerPoint slides:

...facilitates extensive, in-depth surveillance on live communications and stored information. The law allows for the targeting of any customers of participating firms who live outside the US, or those Americans whose communications include people outside the US.

The Washington Post reported that this data has been collected since 2007 from “Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, Apple.”

Apparently Congress has been well-aware of the PRISM system and terrorist activity has been found, but clearly the privacy of the Internet businesses are not as represented to the public. Notwithstanding these reports Google, Apple, and Microsoft have stated that user privacy has not been compromised including this comment from Google: “Google does not have a ‘backdoor’ for the government to access private user data.”

Privacy vs. National Security...the debate will surely continue as we learn more details.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top