Prosecutorial Overreach for Download of 4.8 Million Articles?


With the recent death of accused Aaron Swartz there will be no trial to determine whether Mr. Swartz violated federal wire laws by downloading 4.8 million articles and documents from JSTOR at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In the meantime the National Law Journal is questioning whether the government’s actions were prosecutorial overreach brought by U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz. They quote Ms. Ortiz:

Stealing is stealing whether you use a computer command or a crowbar, and whether you take documents, data, or dollars,...It is equally harmful to the victim whether you sell what you have stolen or give it away.

In the meantime Harvard Law Professor Larry Lessig, one of Swartz’s friends and attorney referred to the "Prosecutor as bully" and added these comments: 

The government, …worked as hard as it could to characterize what Aaron did in the most extreme and absurd way....our government continued to push as if it had caught the 9/11 terrorists red-handed.

Notwithstanding how the government pursued Mr. Swartz we will now never know how a jury would have responded, my question remains, why were charges never filed for Copyright Infringement?

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top