Google US Antitrust Settlement, Not so Fast


Although in mid-December the Washington Post reported that there was an apparent antitrust settlement with Google and the FTC, Google reached out to me to let me know otherwise. Google sent me an email  with a link to former FTC Commissioner Orson Swindle’s article and a Forbes article which I reference below.  Google wanted me to know among other things said:

The FTC, though it looked like it was very soon to announce resolution of its Google investigations, may be putting this off a little longer, at least, presumably due to competitor push back. But, from what has been reported in the media to date, it seems like a solution is very close which not only protects consumers but also protects innovation.

Commission Swindle wrote in the Washington Post regarding the FTC investigation:

Google’s competitors, led by Microsoft and the FairSearch coalition, have been clamoring for government action against the company for years. To the FTC’s credit, it appears this extraordinarily well-funded public relations and lobbying ploy will not bear fruit for FairSearch and its accusation of search bias by Google.

In a recent report Forbes including this summary regarding the FTC investigation:

The final chapter in this investigation clearly has yet to be written, and much may change over the coming weeks and months. If the rumors prove true, the FTC’s actions will send a signal to all tech companies that they must act responsibly, but also that they can continue innovating and growing without constant fear of a potentially damaging enforcement action.

So I guess we all need to stay tuned for the FTC’s action regarding Google’s search engine business.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top