Feds Declare that Blogs and Social Networks are Public Meetings


For purposes of dealing with web 2.0 the White House Memo released on April 7, 2010 about social media specifically states that “interactive meeting tools—including but not limited to public conference calls, webinars, blogs, discussion boards, forums, message boards, chat sessions, social networks, and online communities—to be equivalent to in-person public meetings.” The White House Memo is a follow-up to President Obama’s January 21, 2009 (day after the President was sworn-in) “calling for the establishment of ‘a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration.’” Fascinating development that blogs, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, MySpace, Yelp, and the like are public meetings which means that one should expect little privacy from use of these online services.

Majority of Government Agencies Use Social Networks

This report states that a majority of government agencies now use social networks is hardly a news flash, but put in context of the White House’s Memo that use of social networks are public meetings may change the public view of how they communicate. Of the 400+ million Facebook members of an estimated 70% are outside the US, and one may wonder how communications across international borders impacts the declaration that social media is public meetings.

Yelp and the Business of Extortion 2.0

This recently filed class action suit accuses Yelp of extortion to get bad comments removed from Yelp and lower rankings by reviewers. It remains to be seen whether this case will succeed, but if Yelp is considered a public meeting by the White House it makes one wonder how extortion fits in. Not to mention that the 50 million a day of tweets on Twitter are considered public meetings, even though at least 14,000 are followers of a Doonesbury’s cartoon character Roland Hedley! Web 2.0 is definitely taking us in interesting directions!

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top