A Net Too Wide – SEC Seasoning Rules and Their Applicability to Newly Public Companies


According to published reports, 25% of all securities fraud class action lawsuits filed during the first half of 2011 involved Chinese companies that have gone public through reverse mergers.  A 2011 report by Cornerstone Research stated that 12 securities class action complaints were filed in 2010 against Chinese companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges, representing 42.9% of all class action filings against foreign issuers listed in the U.S.  Commentators assert that one factor fueling this trend is the fact that many Chinese issuers have gone public through reverse mergers with listed U.S. shell companies – a process which, in some cases, results in a significant lack of disclosure associated with the newly public business.

Due in part to increasing allegations of fraud by foreign reverse merger companies, in late 2011, the SEC approved new rules imposing additional requirements on companies intending to list their shares on one of the three major U.S. stock exchanges.  These rules, including applicable exceptions, are described in our prior posts found here and here.  However, it remains to be seen whether these rules will actually help to remedy many of the disclosure issues associated with foreign issuers going public through reverse mergers.

OUR TAKE:  The problem with these seemingly heavy-handed new rules is that they fail to directly address the lack of financial disclosure sometimes associated with foreign issuer reverse mergers.  For example, by requiring reverse merger companies to undergo one year of trading in a systemically under-regulated environment like the OTC Bulletin Board, the SEC may be simply imposing a bureaucratic holding pattern rather than creating targeted, meaningful regulation.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top