SEC Adopts Whistleblower Program


The SEC recently announced its implementation of a new whistleblower program designed to reward “individuals who provide the agency with high-quality tips that lead to successful enforcement actions.”  The new rules (PDF) – created pursuant to Section 922 of the Dodd-Frank Act – will become effective 60 days after they are published in the Federal Register or submitted to Congress. 

To be eligible for an award under the new program, a whistleblower must voluntarily provide original information leading to the successful enforcement by the SEC and monetary sanctions greater than $1 million.

As highlighted in our previous posts (available here and here), the final rules – much like the proposed rules (PDF) – do not require whistleblowers to first report allegations internally to qualify for bounties.  However, in an effort to encourage employees to utilize internal compliance programs when appropriate, the SEC has adopted a number of incentives, including:

  • giving whistleblowers the benefit of an internal reporting date as their effective reporting date for award purposes – provided that the same information, first reported internally, is also reported to the SEC within 120 days; and
  • for purposes of determining the amount of the award, taking into account the employee’s effective use or, when appropriate, misuse of their internal compliance program.

The final rules also adopt an anti-retaliation policy, which protects whistleblowers who provide information on reasonable belief that it “relates to a possible securities law violation that has occurred, is ongoing, or is about to occur.”

OUR TAKE:  The SEC’s dual system by which whistleblowers may report directly to the SEC or internally through existing programs may stifle companies’ efforts to minimize and resolve alleged compliance issues before any SEC involvement.  Whether whistleblowers will pursue SEC bounties over working through existing compliance programs, however, may depend on the how the SEC applies its rules, and pays bounties, over time.

*Many thanks to Josh McConkey, a Gardere summer associate and law student at the Georgetown University Law Center, for his contributions to this post.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top