Judge Reverses His Recent Texas District Court Ruling, Says Collecting Sales Tax on Oil and Gas Equipment Is Proper


Travis County District Judge John Dietz reversed his recent ruling in Southwest Royalties, Inc. v. Combs (D-1-GN-09-004284) and issued a final order stating that sales tax does apply to the sale of machinery and equipment used to extract oil and gas.

The original ruling he made in early April would have made the state liable for billions in tax refunds and face future losses of annual tax revenue of $500 million. The reversal has relieved state budget writers and state legislators, while some in the oil and gas industry are disappointed that sales tax refunds will not be forthcoming.

The plaintiffs claimed that the equipment used to extract oil and gas directly caused a physical change in the oil and gas, and thus exempted the equipment from sales tax under exemptions for manufacturing found in Section 151.318, Texas Tax Code.

Dietz disagreed with the exemption the second time and wrote:

[T]he change of pressure and temperature " raise the changes to marketable" oil and gas and that Plaintiff's equipment that brings it to the surface "is merely an indirect cause of the changes."

It is unknown at this time if Southwest Royalties will appeal the decision.

Southwest Royalties is one of three similar oil and gas industry cases focusing on the sales tax exemption for manufacturing. The first case also was decided in favor of the state. The last case against the Comptroller of Public Accounts is expected to be heard in September.

With all of the attention placed on the sales tax exemption, some in Austin are predicting that next year the Texas Legislature may modify the statute in an attempt to obtain greater clarity.

When such tax statutes are amended, industries that could be impacted — via intended or unintended consequences — should closely monitor such legislative activity. Some entities may use the opportunity to seek minor changes in the statutes to benefit their interests. Others may attempt to exclude themselves from new tax liability.

Gardere's Government Affairs, Tax and Energy Practice Groups are closely monitoring the developments in Southwest Royalties, other similar cases, and the actions of the Texas Legislature.

Austin Partner Mark Vane ( or 512.542.7077), Dallas Partner Michael J. Donohue ( or 214.999.4231), and Houston partner N.L. "Larry" Stevens ( or 713.276.5774) are available to discuss any questions you might have about the content of this alert, as well as Houston Of Counsel Allen B. Craig III ( 713.276.5570).

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top