Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
There is a tremendous amount of scientific study regarding the ability of psychologists and psychiatrists to predict the likelihood that a specific individual will commit future acts of violence. Most of the early studies that were done failed to find any reliable way that such predictions could be made. Indeed, an early review of this "first generation" research found that when mental health professionals assess risk for future danger, they will be accurate only one out of three times when they predict that an individual will be violence in the future. Based largely upon early studies of this kind, the American Psychiatric Association concluded in an amicus brief filed in 1982 that "[p]sychiatrists should not be permitted to offer a prediction concerning the long-term future dangerousness of a defendant in a capital case, at least in those circumstances where the psychiatrist purports to be testifying as a medical expert possessing predictive expertise in this area."
One important reason that early studies were unable to establish a reliable basis for predictions of "future dangerousness" was that the predictions being reviewed generally had not been developed using scientific methods, but rather had been based on largely unstructured subjective judgments. The subsequent application of more rigorous scientific methods yielded modestly more accurate predictions of violence risk potential
in certain settings, as confirmed by later studies. Several features of these more rigorous scientific methods that are important to the reliability of any prediction of violence risk potential are noteworthy. First, consideration of the "base rate" of violence is critical. Research has established that error rates for predictions of future violence vary significantly depending on the -base rate," or the known frequency that a particular behavior will occur within a specified population over a set period of time.
The "base rate" of violent behavior in a given group represents the single most important piece of information in any risk assessment, because it indirectly affects the accuracy of predictions of future dangerousness. Studies have shown that if the "base rate" is low (in other words, if the overall occurrence of the event in question is very infrequent), it is particularly difficult to predict a specific occurrence of the event with reliability, and there is a tendency to over-predict."
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.