Publications

2008 Annual Survey of Fifth Circuit Class Action Cases

Texas Business Litigation Journal
01.01.09

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and its various district courts saw a dramatic increase in class action activity in 2008. Fifth Circuit courts decided 24 cases in 2008 that substantively address Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (“Rule 23”). By way of contrast, Fifth Circuit courts in 2007 decided only 17 cases that substantively addressed Rule 23. In 2007, Fifth Circuit courts certified five classes. Ironically, this year they certified just two.

This year, Fifth Circuit courts addressed Rule 23 issues impacting securities litigation, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), the Class Action Fairness Act, Vioxx and Fen-Phen drug litigation, prisoners’ rights, and immigration law. Like last year, several Hurricane Katrina and Rita-related class action cases made their way onto Louisiana and Mississippi dockets.

Below is a summary of Fifth Circuit, Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana district court opinions substantively addressing Rule 23. Although few, if any, of these cases substantially alter the Rule 23 landscape, several address some of the Rule’s more litigated features, including class certification pursuant to Rules 23(b)(2) & (3). The following cases provide valuable insight into litigating class action issues in the Fifth Circuit.

Read more.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top