Publications

Challenges to Independent Contractor Mislabelling

National Law Journal – Labor & Employment Special Report
01.11.10

With a weakened economy, employers are continually seeking new ways to cut costs. Although the reduction of employee headcount obviously can reduce the payroll budget, employers often still need people to perform the work. With that in mind, companies are more frequently turning to independent contractors to accomplish both goals—performing work at a lower cost and cutting down their payroll budgets. With independent contractors, employers have no obligation to withhold payroll taxes (or to fund the employer-matching portion of the Federal Insurance Contributions Act) or provide any benefits. Throw in the added advantage of having no overtime liability, and it is simple to see that the cost savings can be tremendous.

However, just as paying an employee a salary alone does not exempt the employee from overtime, merely labeling a worker as an independent contractor does not make one so. Increasingly, both government agencies and private citizens are fighting back against these misclassifications and seeking back taxes, benefits and other damages. Therefore, employers should use extreme caution when hiring workers solely as contractors.

Most employers realize that wage-and-hour collective actions dominate headlines and create significant problems for companies, regardless of their size. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) Wage and Hour Division’s statistics show that the agency recovered $185,287,827 in unpaid wages in fiscal year 2008—the most up-to-date report available. Department of Labor 2008 Statistics Fact Sheet, www.dol.-gov/whd/statistics/2008FiscalYear.htm. However, what cannot be told from those statistics is what percentage of the DOL’s cases involve misclassification of workers as independent contractors. Instead, the DOL classifies cases as minimum wage and overtime. Misclassification as an independent contractor would fit within the overtime category.

Read more.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top