Publications

2012 Annual Survey of Fifth Circuit Class Action Cases

Texas Business Litigation Journal
01.01.13

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and the federal district courts in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi saw a slight increase in class action activity in 2012 compared to 2011. In 2011, these courts decided thirteen cases substantively addressing Rule 23 litigation classes and two settlement classes, certifying seven of the proposed litigation classes and approving both of the class action settlements. The same courts in 2012 decided fifteen cases that substantively addressed Rule 23 litigation classes and four settlement classes, certifying only two of the proposed litigation classes but approving all four class action settlements.

This past year, the Fifth Circuit and district courts in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi addressed class actions involving Rule 23 issues impacting federal laws such as the Sherman Act, ERISA, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, among others. The courts also addressed class actions involving violations of state law, including negligence, breach of warranty, fraud, and various statutory causes of action. The following is a summary of decisions by the Fifth Circuit and associated district courts that substantively addressed Rule 23. Hopefully, this will provide some valuable insight into litigating class action issues in the Fifth Circuit.

Read More.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top