Publications

Use eMediation to Save Time and Money

Texas Lawyer
09.02.13

Using eMediation will not eliminate eDiscovery disputes, but will most assuredly reduce the time, money, and energy of eDiscovery motion practice, says Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP Partner Peter Vogel. eMediation offers parties a means to have control over their cases in what is still a most unique manner. 

In 1991, in my first speech about eDiscovery, I commented that every lawsuit had electronic evidence (eEvidence). A number of audience members informed me that I had no idea what I talking about. Fast forward more than 20 years, and it is an undeniable fact that every lawsuit has eEvidence. As a result, every trial lawyer is now required to understand eEvidence.

Not long before that 1991 speech, the Texas legislature enacted the Alternative Disputes Resolutions Act (1987) requiring trial lawyers to consider mediation to settle cases. The ADR Act was an attempt to get cases settled at the earliest point in time possible. Often an early adopter, I became a certified Mediator in 1990 and have mediated hundreds of cases — although originally in my areas of expertise, including computer software implementation disputes (often ERP projects), misappropriation of trade secrets, patent infringement, copyright infringement, and Internet eCommerce disputes. eMediation was not done in the 1990's as far as I know.

Read More.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top