Publications

Commentary: Court cases suggest Texas is heading to a subsurface lease market

FuelFix.com
06.06.14

With a subsurface trespass case pending before the Texas Supreme Court and a recent $3 million nuisance verdict that has been called the nation’s “first fracking trial,” the industry may be wondering whether Texas is headed toward a subsurface lease market. At least that’s what FPL Farming v. Environmental Processing Systems and Parr v. Aruba Petroleum seem to suggest.

The Supreme Court has already once considered FPL Farming, when it rejected the operator’s argument that a valid injection permit immunizes a wastewater injector from trespass liability. After a jury found no trespass upon remand, the Beaumont Court of Appeals held — for the first time ever — that neighboring landowners have valid a claim for trespass.

Now that the Supreme Court stands poised to finally rule on the trespass issue, the Texas Association of Oil & Gas and Association of Energy Services Companies of Texas argue that transactional costs to the entire industry will rise dramatically if a jury can hear trespass claims without regard to a plaintiff’s injury. Given the high cost of trespass litigation, AESC argues that it could become cheaper just to pay neighboring landowners for subsurface leases to keep them from suing — a modern take on what the industry has traditionally called a holdout.

Read More.

 

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top