Publications

Be Aware of Successor Liability for Violating U.S. Trade Laws

Texas Lawyer
06.08.15

Corporate due diligence is far from a new concept, and the words “due diligence” probably evoke mental images of associates plowing through stacks of documents or clicking through gigabytes of electronic files searching for potential lawsuits, unpaid bills and other scary things that turn a good-looking deal into a nightmare. Hidden in plain sight, and often overlooked, are the acquired company’s violations of U.S. trade laws, along with the associated fines, penalties and loss of productive hours in trying to figure out what the company did wrong and how to fix it in the future.

Here’s a common scenario: A U.S. company starts selling its products domestically, and as it expands, it begins exporting products and importing supplies. As sales drive more exports, the sales team grows, but the compliance team, if it exists at all, stays relatively small. Despite its lack of a robust compliance program, the company continues its international trade. The company relies heavily on its shipping companies to comply with U.S. trade laws – laws that are complicated and administered by multiple agencies, including the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security, the Department of Defense Directorate of Defense Trade Controls and the Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Affairs. Without a compliance program in place, it is unlikely that the growing company can keep up with the many complex laws, while the shipping companies file what they presume is accurate information but may or may not be compliant.

A second company looking to expand beyond domestic operations enters into a deal to acquire the company. The due diligence process begins, and a team crawls through the acquisition company’s records but never looks at trade compliance. The deal closes, and the acquirer is now an exporter and importer. Being inexperienced with U.S. trade laws, the acquirer continues the processes of the acquired company.

Read More.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top