Publications

2011 Annual Survey of Texas Class Action Cases

Texas Business Litigation Journal
01.01.12

I.  Introduction
The number of class certification opinions in Texas appellate courts slowed to a trickle in 2011. It appears that trial courts around the state have now adapted to the strict class certification standards announced by the Texas Supreme Court more than a decade ago in Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. Bernal.2 As a result, for the first time in recent memory, the Texas Supreme Court did not issue a single opinion addressing class certification standards. Furthermore, only two lower appellate court cases addressed class certification. Class action jurisprudence has matured in Texas and as a result, the long predicted demise of Texas class actions may have become a reality.3

II. Overview of 2011 Case Law

A. Class Certification Standards

Only one court of appeals addressed class certification standards in 2011. In Riemer v. The State of Texas,4 the Amarillo Court of Appeals addressed potential conflicts in a proposed class before affirming the trial court’s denial of a motion for class certification. The appeal concerned an interlocutory order denying class certification in a dispute between landowners and the State of Texas over the boundaries of the Canadian River.5 The plaintiffs alleged an unconstitutional taking of their property by the State when it redefined the centerline and banks of the river.6

Read More.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top