Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
Two courtroom verdicts won by attorneys from Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP are being recognized among the top jury awards of 2012 by the publishers of Texas Lawyer and VerdictSearch, the leading guide to U.S. verdicts.
Gardere's Craig B. Florence, Randy D. Gordon and Rachel Kingrey worked alongside Mikal Watts and Frank Guerra of Corpus Christi's Watts Guerra Craft LLP to win a $162 million verdict for client Longview Energy Co. in a breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit involving leases in the Eagle Ford Shale. The jury award ranked as the third-largest verdict in the state during 2012, and the final judgment of more than $500 million is considered the largest-ever in a legal dispute involving the Eagle Ford Shale.
Jurors in Longview Energy Company v. The Huff Energy Fund L.P. et al., found that directors Bill Huff and Rick D'Angelo used The Huff Energy Fund portfolio company, Riley-Huff Energy Group, to breach their fiduciary duty by covertly securing approximately 46,000 Eagle Ford leasehold acres that were being explored by Longview Energy.
The final judgment ordered Riley-Huff to transfer title to the Eagle Ford leased acres and all related wells and production facilities to Longview Energy. The defendants also were ordered to pay Longview Energy $95.5 million for past revenues, in addition to production proceeds earned from the leasehold acres. The judgment carried an award of 5 percent annual post-judgment interest.
Gardere Litigation Partners Mark A. Mayfield and Mark T. Mitchell won a $4.5 million verdict for plaintiffs William Bishop and Pinnacle Potash International in a theft of trade secrets case. The jury award in William M. Bishop, et al. v. E. Barger Miller II ranked as the state's 10th largest Contracts Law verdict during 2012. Mr. Mitchell earned "Litigator of the Week" honors from Texas Lawyer based on the victory.
Mr. Bishop, an engineer, developed a new and untested system to inject brine into salt deposits underground and then retrieve the material through a proprietary method that mitigates the detrimental environmental effects of mining potash, a primary ingredient in plant fertilizers. Mr. Bishop formed a partnership with the defendant, E. Barger Miller II, and intended to acquire leases from the federal government to utilize the technology he developed, which was patented during the course of the litigation. Mr. Miller then purchased Reunion Potash Co., which owned the federal leases, as a means to utilize Mr. Bishop's technology. After excluding Mr. Bishop from his plan, Mr. Miller then hired independent consultants with whom he shared Mr. Bishop's patented ideas.
Asserting claims of theft of trade secrets, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and partnership issues of first impression during the three-week trial, the Gardere team persuaded jurors to award damages based on a reasonable-royalty damage model even though their client incurred no lost profits.
Texas Lawyer is a member of the American Lawyer Media family and provides coverage of the Texas legal market to more than 16,300 members of the Lone Star legal community. Texas Lawyer compiles the Top Texas Verdicts annually by examining cases reported by its VerdictSearch affiliate.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.