News

Law360 Features Comments From Carrie Hoffman on UPS Pregnancy Discrimination Ruling

03.25.15

Law360 covered the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that vacated a 4th Circuit decision on a pregnancy bias case against UPS. The publication spoke with attorneys from around the United States to find out why the decision in Young v. United Parcel Service Inc. is significant, featuring comments from Gardere Labor and Employment Partner Carrie B. Hoffman.

"While the Supreme Court vacated the summary judgment granted in favor of UPS, the decision is not a complete victory for plaintiffs. Instead, the court declined to grant 'most favored nation' type status to pregnant workers. And, additionally, the court expressed serious concern that the EEOC's most recent guidance on pregnancy discrimination was promulgated after the court had granted certiorari and took a position about which the EEOC had previously been silent. Moreover, the EEOC's guidance contradicted the government's prior positions in other matters. The court chose therefore to apply the McDonnell-Douglas framework to the analysis and therefore vacated summary judgment and remanded to the 4th Circuit to determine in light of its holding that the policies of UPS should be considered in the analysis."

Subscribers can access the full article here.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top