Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
On March 5, 2012, we blogged about the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruling that the NLRB properly promulgated a requirement that employers post a notice informing emploeyes of their rights under the NLRA. Under the rule, employers were required to post the notice by April 30, 2012.
Today, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Appeals issued an injunction blocking the rule from taking effect on April 30, 2012. The Court of Appeals has established an expedited briefing schedule for the case. Oral argument is set for September 2012. The issue before the Court of Appeals is whether the NLRB lacked authority to implement the rule.
This injunction was issued only four days after the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina struck down the NLRB rule requiring employers to post the notice. Chamber of Commerce of the United States and South Carolina Chamber of Commerce v. NRLB, et. al. The Chamber of Commerce of the United States and the South Carolina Chamber of Commerce sought review of the final rule promulgated by the NRLB requiring employers to post notice to employees of their rights under the NLRA. The Chambers of Commerce and the NLRB filed cross motions for summary judgment. The Court granted the summary judgment motion of the Chambers of Commerce finding that the notice requirement exceeds the NLRB’s authority.
Specifically, the South Carolina district court pointed out that the NLRB had not, in 75 years, ever previously required a notice to be posted. The Court noted that the poster requirement “proactively dictates employer conduct prior to the filing of any petition or charge, and such a rule is inconsistent with the Board’s reactive role under the Act.” Opinion at page 20. The Court further analyzed the statutory text and legislative history and could find nothing that provided any authority to the NLRB to require the notice to be posted. The Court compared the NLRA to other employment statutes (like Title VII) which affirmatively require notices to be posted. Noting that the NLRA contained no such provisions, the Court found that the notice rule exceeded the NLRB’s authority.
For now, employers are not required to post the NLRB poster.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.