Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
On April 29, 2014, power giant Energy Future Holding Corp. ("Energy Future"), along with 70 subsidiaries, filed for chapter 11 protection in the District of Delaware as part of a deal it has reached through lengthy negotiations with some of its largest senior creditors to restructure roughly $50 billion in debt.
In the halcyon days of 2007, when the U.S and global economies were strong and natural gas prices high and rising, KKR & Co., TPG, and the private equity arm of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. made history by taking Energy Future (formerly TXU Corp.) private for approximately $32 billion and $13 billion in assumed debt as part of the largest leveraged buyout in in U.S. history. The buyout represented a bet that Energy Future would continue to hold its strong strategic position in the power market, as its main sources of electricity production—coal and uranium—were markedly less expensive at the time than the natural gas that was used to determine electricity rates in Texas. However, the global economic crisis and substantial slide in natural gas prices that quickly followed the deal erased Energy Future's price advantage and made it increasingly difficult for Energy Future Holding Corp. to service its substantial debt load.
Months of negotiations with senior creditors prior to the chapter 11 filing provided the basis for key parts of pre-arranged chapter 11 plan. The proposed plan would spin-off Energy Future's subsidiary, Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co. LLC ("TCEH"), giving TCEH's first lien creditors, among other things, full equity ownership in the newly reorganized TCEH to extinguish approximately $23 billion in first lien debt. TCEH is the parent company of Luminant and TXU Energy, which are both core operating assets of the debtors' business. The proposed plan would also pay a number of other senior creditors of other debtor entities more or less in full, pursuant to the various settlement agreements amongst those parties.
Energy Future has announced that it seeks to have its proposed plan approved by the bankruptcy court within nine months and emerge from bankruptcy within one year. However, it appears that junior creditors who were not parties to the restructuring negotiations will try to interrupt the debtors' goal of a quick and painless exit from bankruptcy. The indenture trustee for TCEH's second lien creditors has filed motions challenging venue and seeking authorization for a Rule 2004 examination (which would permit the trustee to conduct certain types of discovery under the Bankruptcy Rules) of the debtors and related third parties. In the Rule 2004 motion, the indenture trustee asserts that the debtors' senior management had "disabling conflicts of interest" and may have artificially depressed the debtors' value for restructuring purposes. [Dkt. No. 6 at 1]. The motion further asserts that the proposed plan would pay the TCEH first lien creditors in excess of their claims. Id. at 7. Other junior creditors have filed objections to the debtors' requests for post-petition financing, which are critical components of the proposed plan. The bankruptcy court has issued an interim order permitting the debtors to enter a commitment letter for certain post-petition financing, and has set a final hearing on post-petition financing for June 5.
The case is In re Energy Future Holdings Corp., Case No. 1:14-bk-10979. It is before Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Sontchi in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.