Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
In the acquisition of a private company by merger, a purchaser will often desire to obtain a release, an indemnification obligation, and a consent to an appointment of a post-closing representative from each of the shareholders or other owners of the target entity, including even those who do not vote for or consent to the merger (and who do not dissent or exercise appraisal rights). The current approach - the inclusion of agreements and covenants in, and relying upon, a letter of transmittal from each shareholder requesting delivery of the merger consideration - has been made questionable (if not invalidated) under Delaware law by the recent decision of the Delaware Chancery Court in Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company v. Audax Health Solutions, et al. A purchaser desiring to effect such an acquisition by merger and obtain such rights or benefits will apparently be forced to adopt a somewhat different approach.
A private company that anticipates a purchaser's demand for those kinds of rights or benefits, however, might make itself more "purchaser-friendly" by including a well-drafted "drag-along" provision in one of its governing documents or in a separate agreement among the shareholders or other owners of the entity.
A "drag-along" provision permits an equity owner or certain equity owners to force all or certain other equity owners to sell some or all of their equity interests or to approve a sale of an entity. Such a provision is usually a part of a shareholders' agreement, an LLC company agreement, or a joint venture agreement, though it may also be the topic of a separate agreement between or among equity owners. The provision may be intended to provide a right to a certain group of equity owners (e.g., a private-equity investor group) to cause a sale, or it may be intended as a mechanism to assure that the equity owners will approve a sale desired by those owners with a large percentage of the ownership interests. Although there may not be a decision that specifically holds that a drag-along provision is enforceable under Delaware law, there have been at least a couple of court decisions suggesting that a drag-along provision is enforceable under Delaware law.
A drag-along provision typically includes, among other things, the agreement of each equity owner who is "dragged along" in the sale to (as necessary) vote or deliver a consent for the sale and to enter into the same, or comparable, agreements and covenants as the "dragging" owner or owners enter into in the sale of agreement and related documents to effect the sale.
To facilitate a possible future sale, a drag-along provision might elaborate on the general agreement and obligation of the dragging owner by specifically obligating the owner to take one or more of the following actions, to the extent the dragging owner also does so:
Such an approach may well make it easier for owners who desire, and have the right, to cause the private company to be sold to accede to some of the typical demands of a purchaser.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.