Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
The "default" fiduciary duties imposed by each of Delaware and Texas law on an LLC manager appear to pose an impediment to the designating LLC member's realizing the full benefit of having a representative manager on the LLC's board of managers.
As the result of a 2013 amendment to the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, if the LLC is a Delaware LLC and its LLC Agreement does not address a manager's fiduciary duties to the LLC and its members, then a manager of the LLC has the same kinds of fiduciary duties to the LLC and its members generally as the director of a Delaware business corporation has to the corporation and its stockholders generally. Under recent Texas case law, it likewise appears that if the LLC is a Texas LLC and its LLC Agreement does not address a manager's fiduciary duties, then a manager of the LLC has the same kinds of fiduciary duties to the LLC and its members generally as the director of a Texas for-profit corporation has to the corporation and its shareholders generally. In each case, those fiduciary duties consist principally of the duty of due care and the duty of loyalty.
In the corporation context, Delaware courts have recognized the divided loyalties of a representative director to the corporation and to the particular stockholder or group of stockholders, such as holders of preferred stock, that have elected that representative director. The courts have almost always resolved that tension by giving precedence to the director's fiduciary duties over any obligation the director may have to any particular stockholder or group of stockholders, even when the director's allegiance to a particular stockholder or group of stockholders is evident. The Delaware courts have upheld the general rule that a director's primary concern must be to act in the best interests of the corporation and its stockholders as a whole. Accordingly, corporate directors have been held to breach their fiduciary duties by sharing a corporation's material confidential information with the particular stockholder or stockholders they represent or by voting or otherwise acting as a director in a way that would benefit the particular stockholder or stockholders they represent instead of the corporation and its stockholders generally. If this corporate approach were applied to an LLC and its managers, a representative manager might in effect be precluded from representing the interests of the designating member as intended by the designating member and undertaken by the representative manager.
Each of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act and the LLC provisions of the Texas Business Organizations Code permit the LLC's members to agree to vary the duties of managers of the LLC, subject to certain restrictions. Consistent with the contractual basis or orientation of an LLC, each statute specifically allows the expansion, limitation, or elimination of a manager's fiduciary duties in the LLC Agreement. Under each of Delaware and Texas law, the flexibility of an LLC clearly offers the possibility of addressing the conflict between fiduciary duties and obligations to a particular constituency that the corporate form does not offer, or at least does not as clearly offer. If a designating member desires to provide that, in the event of a conflict in loyalties or duties, the duties to the LLC and its members generally will not preclude the representative manager from preferring and advancing the interests of the designating member, then the LLC Agreement could include provisions that facilitate the desired arrangement.
A number of those possible provisions will be described in the next two posts.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.