Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
A recent report showed a slight increase from 10% to 26% of companies with cyber insurance coverage between 2013 and 2014, and stated that most US companies are deficient in “keeping the data breach response plan up-to-date, conducting risk assessments of areas vulnerable to a breach, continuous monitoring of information systems to detect unusual and anomalous traffic and investing in technologies that enable timely detections of a security breach.” In September 2014 the Ponemon Institute LLC issued a report entitled “Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach?” which was sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution and stated that cyber insurance policies and incident response (IR) awareness are becoming more important:
In 2013, only 10 percent of respondents said their company purchased a policy. This year, the percentage more than doubled to 26 percent. Further, the use of standard or model contract terms with third parties, vendors or business partners increased. In 2013, 65 percent of respondents said their organizations had these in place and this year it increased to 70 percent of respondents.
Here are topics reported by Ponemon about cyber problems and IR planning:
More companies have data breach response plans and teams in place. In 2013, 61 percent of companies had such a plan in place. This increased to 73 percent in this year’s study. More companies have teams to lead data breach response efforts. In the 2013 study, 67 percent of respondents said they had a data breach response team. This increased to 72 percent.
Data breaches have increased in frequency. In 2013, 33 percent of respondents said their company had a data breach. This year, the percentage has increased to 43 percent. Sixty percent say their company experienced more than one data breach in the past two years. This increased from 52 percent of respondents in 2013.
Most companies have privacy and data protection awareness programs. Ponemon Institute research has revealed that mistakes made by employees are a frequent cause of data breach. While we believe all companies should have such a program, it is a good sign that the existence of training programs increased. In this year’s study, 54 percent say they have privacy and data protection awareness training for employees and other stakeholders who have access to sensitive personal information. This increased from 44 percent in 2013.
There was very little change in the training of customer service personnel. When companies lose customer data, very often it is customer service that must field questions from concerned customers. In 2013, 30 percent of respondents said they provided training on how to respond to questions about a data breach incident. This increased slightly to 34 percent of respondents in 2014.
Informationworld Darkreading also reported:
Nearly three-fourths of US Fortune 500 companies now have set up incident response plans and teams in preparation for cyberattacks, but only one-third of them consider their IR operations actually effective in the face of a data breach, according to a new study.
Hopefully more companies will understand their risk and do a better job to protect with cyber insurance and IR
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.