Blogs

$100+ Million Lawsuit Threat to Google Over Celebrity Pictures

10.07.14

TexasBarToday_TopTen_Badge_Small (1)

A demand letter reminded Google of its corporate motto “Don’t be evil,” alleged that Google is making “millions and profiting from the victimization of women,” and that “it is time that Google owns up to its conduct and remedies this gross violation of law, ethics, moral and basic privacy rights.” The October 1, 2014 letter with a Re line “Google’s Repeated Copyright & Privacy Violation in Connection with Hacked Photo Scandal” was sent by attorney Martin Singer of the Los Angeles, California law firm of Lavely & Singer on behalf of over:

…a dozen female celebrities, actresses, models and athletes, whose confidential, personal, private photos and videos (the “Images”) were recently hacked from their respective iCloud accounts and illegally posted on various websites and blogs, including YouTube, Blogspot and other Google based sites, servers and systems.

Mr. Singer’s letter also accuses Google of unethical behavior for which Google is exposed to significant liability for compensatory and punitive damages that could excel $100,000,000 for:

…Google’s despicable, reprehensible conduct in not only failing to act expeditiously and responsibly to remove the Images, but in knowingly accommodating, facilitating and perpetuating the unlawful conduct.

eWEEK reported about Mr. Singer’s letter and described the a common security researcher practice known as Google Hacking as “searching for bad things, including potential security issues on Google…” However “whether Google is responsible for users who are searching for bad things” is unclear with mixed opinions by technology experts interviewed by eWEEK.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top