Blogs

Privacy Update -EU Launches Enforcement Against Google

04.03.13

Google’s March 2012 Privacy Policy has never been well-received in the EU, and after waiting for Google to change its Privacy Policy the EU now plans to take action. The CNIL (Commission nationale de l’informatique et des libertés) announced on April 2, 2013 that 6 EU states have launched coordinated enforcement actions. These 6 EU states are France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United-Kingdom, but each EU state must pursue their own action and seek fines.

CNIL is the French data protection agency which “...is responsible for ensuring that information technology remains at the service of citizens, and does not jeopardize human identity or breach human rights, privacy or individual or public liberties.”

In October 2012 the CNIL sent a letter which included this statement about the Google’s response to the EU’s inquiry:

Google’s answers have not demonstrated that your company endorses the key data protection principles of purpose limitation, data quality, data minimization, proportionality and right to object. Indeed, the Privacy policy suggests the absence of any limit concerning the scope of the collection and the potential uses of the personal data.

The letter included these three legal issues:

  • Firstly, the investigation showed that Google provides insufficient information to its users (including passive users), especially on the purposes and the categories of data being processed.
  • Secondly, the investigation confirmed our concerns about the combination of data across services.
  • Finally, Google failed to provide retention periods for the personal data it processes.

However in the April 2nd announcement the CNIL stated that “Google has not implemented any significant compliance measures.” It will be interesting to see the outcome and its impact on Google and privacy.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top