Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
The recent decision of the federal Second Circuit Court of Appeals in U.S. v. Newman et al. (December 10, 2014) is noteworthy for a few reasons. Among them is the Court's analysis and discussion - and clarification - of what constitutes a "personal benefit" that must be received by a tipper for tipping insider-trading liability to be imposed on a tippee under SEC Rule 10b-5.
The Court acknowledged that "personal benefit" has been broadly construed by courts to "include not only pecuniary gain, but also… any reputational benefit that will translate into future earnings and the benefit one would obtain by simply making a gift of confidential information to a trading relative or friend." But the Court stated that "the mere fact of a friendship, particularly of a casual or social nature," is not enough from which to deduce that the tipper received a personal benefit. Instead, there must be "proof of a meaningfully close personal relationship that generates an exchange that is objective, consequential, and represents at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature. In other words, … this requires evidence of 'a relationship between the [tipper] and the [tippee] that suggests a quid pro quo from the [tippee], or an intention to benefit the [tippee].'"
Accordingly, the Court concluded that, in light of the evidence in the particular case regarding two separate tipping relationships,
The Court's analysis of "personal benefit" in the situation involving a tipper and a tippee may also be relevant to whether an insider's gift of his or her company's securities exposes the insider to insider-trading liability. As described in a previous blog post, an argument that such a gift constitutes a "sale," or an action "in connection with" a sale, of securities for the purpose of Rule 10b-5 is made by analogy to a tipper-tippee relationship. That is, such a gift would be more likely to be characterized as a sale, or in connection with a sale, of securities if the donor receives a "personal benefit" by making the gift. The Court's emphasis on evidence of an exchange or a quid pro quo arrangement to find a personal benefit may suggest that such a gift should not be characterized as a sale, or in connection with a sale, of securities unless the donor controls or significantly influences, or is otherwise closely associated, with the donee or receives some significant reputational benefit from the gift.
OUR TAKE: As other commentators on the Court's decision have pointed out, the Court's analysis and decision may adversely affect the SEC's efforts to criminally prosecute insider-trading. Nevertheless, the Court's analysis and discussion of what constitutes a "personal benefit" provides some valuable clarity, and may apply beyond tipper-tippee situations.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.