Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
Persons seriously considering, on an informed basis, going public through a reverse merger with a public shell company likely understand that the transaction will not create liquidity for shareholders of the public company within at least a year after the merger. What those persons may not appreciate, however, is the restriction on shareholder liquidity that will continue for years after the merger.
Frequently, the public company in a reverse merger is or was a “shell company,” as defined in Rule 144(i)(1) and Rule 405 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended . The shares held by the public company’s shareholders after the merger may be publicly resold only in accordance with a resale registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission – which is unusual – or under Rule 144, the principal exemption from registration for resales of securities under the Securities Act. Rule 144 is first available to permit public resales of the public company’s shares only one year after the public company has filed Form 10 information with the SEC, if the public company has ceased to be a shell company and has filed all required periodic SEC reports during the year. (“Form 10 information” is the information required of a company filing a registration of securities on Form 10 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which is typically included in a Form 8-K, often referred to as a “Super 8-K,” filed by the public company promptly after the merger.)
Unfortunately for the public company’s shareholders, however, the availability of Rule 144 for resales of shares issued while the company is a shell company or thereafter may be restricted even after the expiration of that one-year period. Rule 144(i)(2) provides that the Rule 144 exemption is available to a shareholder of any public company that was a shell company only if the company is current on all of its periodic reports required to be filed with the SEC during the 12 months before the date of the shareholder’s resale. This condition to the availability of Rule 144 must be satisfied regardless of the time that has elapsed since the public company ceased to be a shell company and regardless of when the shares were issued. In its Securities Act Rules Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Question 137.01, the SEC has made it clear that this condition must be satisfied even regarding shares issued by the public company long after it ceases to be a shell company. If this condition is not satisfied at the time a shareholder wishes to sell (because, for example, the company did not timely file a Form 10-Q), Rule 144 will not be available; and in the absence of a resale registration covering the sale, the shareholder would be able only to privately resell his shares – with the likely decreased value and the procedural limitations that such a resale would involve.
As a few practitioners and commentators have pointed out since the amendments to Rule 144 became effective in 2008, the limited availability of Rule 144 for shareholders of a former shell company may be unfair under certain circumstances. Also, the condition to the availability of Rule 144 provided in Rule 144(i)(2) does not apply to shares of a public companies that was not a shell company. The SEC is apparently so focused on making a reverse merger into a public shell company unattractive, however, that it has not yet proposed any amendment to Rule 144 to address that unfairness or discrepancy.
OUR TAKE: Even if a reverse merger into a public shell company is otherwise attractive, persons considering such a transaction should be informed of the risk of restricted liquidity for shareholders that will continue long after the transaction.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.