Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
Netflix and its CEO Reed Hastings received a Wells notice from the SEC on December 5 relating to a social media post that Mr. Hastings made on his Facebook page back in July. A “Wells notice” is a letter that the SEC issues to individuals or companies to warn them that the SEC intends to bring an enforcement action against them. In this case, the SEC staff has informed Netflix that they are recommending that the SEC bring a civil action against Netflix for a Facebook post by Mr. Hastings related to Netflix members reaching one billion hours a month in video streaming. The SEC is asserting that Netflix violated Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) as a result of this posting.
Regulation FD was adopted to address the selective disclosure of information by publicly traded companies and other issuers. Regulation FD provides that when an issuer discloses material nonpublic information to certain individuals or entities—generally, securities market professionals, such as stock analysts, or holders of the issuer’s securities who may trade on the basis of the information—the issuer must make public disclosure of that information. In other words, the rule was intended to ensure that individual investors have the same access to material information as large institutional investors by prohibiting selective disclosure of material information.
The SEC staff is apparently taking the position that Netflix provided Mr. Hastings’ Facebook “Friends” with material information in his posting and that Netflix should have released the information regarding the billion hours of streaming with a Form 8-K filing or press release.
Mr. Hastings issued a statement yesterday that included the following comments:
In early July, I publicly posted on Facebook to the over 200,000 of you who subscribe to me that our members had enjoyed over 1 billion hours in June, highlighting how strong our content was. There was press coverage as there are many reporters and bloggers among you, my public followers. Some of you re-posted my post. Again, we did not also issue a press release or file an 8-K about this. . . . .
I want to note a few things.
First, we think posting to over 200,000 people is very public, especially because many of my subscribers are reporters and bloggers.
Second, while we think my public Facebook post is public, we don’t currently use Facebook and other social media to get material information to investors; we usually get that information out in our extensive investor letters, press releases and SEC filings. We think the fact of 1 billion hours of viewing in June was not “material” to investors, and we had blogged a few weeks before that we were serving nearly 1 billion hours per month.
OUR TAKE: Without passing on the merits of whether the information posted by Mr. Hastings on Facebook was material or not, if the stated intent of Regulation FD is to “level the playing field” by requiring issuers to provide “full and fair disclosure” on a “broad and non-exclusionary” basis, what better way to accomplish that goal than by allowing companies to use popular social media as a means for disseminating material information. Social media has become an exceptionally popular and publicly available venue for communication of all kinds – and it is clearly more dynamic and interactive than a company website. SEC rulemaking on the methods of fair disclosure needs to evolve to take into account the enormous growth of social media as a means of daily communication. To provide some perspective, Regulation FD was adopted in 2000. Facebook was launched in 2004 and has reached over 1 billion active users this year. Hopefully, the SEC will take this Netflix issue as an opportunity to clarify its rules on public disclosure and expand the means through which an issuer can make public disclosure to include popular social media.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.