Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
The Securities and Exchange Commission recently published the proposed NASDAQ listing rules to comply with the SEC’s Rule 10C-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Rule 10C-1, adopted as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, requires the national securities exchanges, including NASDAQ, generally to prohibit the listing of any equity security of an issuer that does not comply with specified requirements regarding compensation committees. This is an instance of Congress directing the SEC to direct the national securities exchanges to adopt legal requirements. The SEC is still in its review period applicable to, and is still accepting comments on, the proposed rules, but the rules might be approved within the next month. The effects of that approval are described below.
In brief, the proposed rules require that:
That a NASDAQ-listed issuer have a compensation committee, with at least two independent directors, under a formal charter would be a new requirement. The existing NASDAQ rules permit a majority of independent directors, rather than a committee, to determine executive compensation; and even if there is a compensation committee, it may consist of only one director and may operate under board authorizing resolutions rather than under a charter. This new requirement may not have much impact, however, because I believe that most NASDAQ-listed issuers already have a compensation committee with more than one member governed by a charter.
The proposed additional independence requirements for a compensation committee member would make the NASDAQ standard like the SEC’s and NASDAQ’s independence standard for an audit committee member, except that affiliation with the issuer would not automatically be disqualifying. The only compensation from an issuer that such member could accept would be fees for serving as a member of the board or any committee and fixed compensation under a retirement plan for prior service. This prohibition on compensation would not relate to any compensation received before service on the compensation committee. A director’s being an affiliate of the issuer would not render him or her non-independent under the proposed rules. But, consistent with Rule 10C-1, the NASDAQ rules would require the board to expressly consider whether the director is an affiliate, and if so, whether that affiliation would impair his or her judgment as a compensation committee member. If approved, the new rules would require the board of directors of each NASDAQ-listed issuer to evaluate each current and prospective compensation committee member according to the new independence standard.
The proposed NASDAQ requirements regarding the compensation committee’s relationship with its compensation advisors are consistent with Rule 10C-1. Compensation advisors for this purpose include not only professionals described as compensation consultants, but also outside counsel and accountants or tax advisors that provide advice to the compensation committee. I suspect that the existing charters of most compensation committees of NASDAQ-listed issuers already have provisions addressing the requirements, except for the requirement to consider the six independence factors regarding compensation advisors. But if the proposed rules are approved, existing charters may require revision to expressly address the requirements. Apart from statements in the charter, under the proposed rules, a compensation committee would have to exercise some judgment about a few critical issues, including who constitutes an “advisor,” what constitutes “selecting” an advisor, and what constitutes “oversight” of an advisor.
By its terms, Rule 10C-1 does not apply to smaller reporting companies. The proposed NASDAQ rules are consistent, except that a smaller reporting company:
If the proposed rules are approved by the SEC:
OUR TAKE: Because the proposed rules do not deviate materially from the Rule 10C-1 requirements, it appears likely that the SEC will approve them without significant amendment. Accordingly, it would be prudent for NASDAQ-listed issuers to begin to consider how they might address the new requirements, especially those regarding the independence of their compensation committee members, the content of their compensation committee charters, and the assessment of independence or conflicts of interest of their compensation committee advisors.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.