Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
While the provisions of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, commonly known as the “JOBS Act,” to enable capital-raising by crowdfunding await the required rulemaking by the Securities and Exchange Commission, it has been interesting to read about the recent efforts of a relativel
y new organization, Crowdfund Intermediary Regulatory Advocates, or “CFIRA,” to influence the rulemaking by the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or “FINRA,” the SEC-approved self-regulatory organization for securities brokers and dealers.
As noted in a previous post, the passage of the JOBS Act offers the promise that small businesses will be able legally to raise a limited amount of equity and debt capital under the securities laws by crowdfunding. Those provisions of the JOBS Act were intended to address the need for capital formation by smaller growing businesses, which would, it was hoped, cause general economic growth. Those provisions amended certain federal securities statutes but still require amendments to various SEC rules. Section 302(c) of Title III of the JOBS Act specified that such rulemaking must be completed by about January 1, 2013, though in light of the SEC’s heavy workload and its history in adopting other rules required by the JOBS Act, it would be understandable if such rulemaking were delayed. Also, a condition to the use of crowdfunding to raise capital is the use of either a broker-dealer registered with FINRA or a “funding portal” that will be required to register with the SEC and become a member of a “national securities organization” under some rules yet to be promulgated. Because the only existing national securities association is FINRA, the rules or regulations of FINRA are also likely to be critical to the development of capital-raising crowdfunding.
It is therefore interesting that CFIRA was formed and is focusing not on encouraging public or Congressional support, but on the development of the regulatory system, for capital-raising crowd funding. CFIRA describes itself as “an organization formed by the crowdfunding industry’s leading platforms and experts” to “work with” the SEC, FINRA, and other “governmental and quasi-governmental entities to help establish industry standards and best practices.”
CFIRA has recently submitted letters of comment to the SEC regarding the proposed use of general solicitation in an exempt Rule 506 offering under Regulation D and to FINRA regarding suggestions for certain rules to govern intermediaries for capital-raising crowdfunding. Those letters appear to reflect that CFIRA appreciates the kinds of amendments to current SEC and FINRA rules that will be required and is advocating rule changes not blindly, but with the understanding that the investor protection-function of securities laws and FINRA rules is important, even in the context of capital-raising crowdfunding.
OUR TAKE: The emerging activity of CFIRA during the rulemaking process to permit crowdfunding for raising capital appears to be positive, and it will be interesting to see if CFIRA plays an influential role in the development of the regulatory system.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.