Blogs

SEC Takes a Look at Capital Raising

09.15.11

We reported in May 2011 about the future of capital formation—through testimony by the SEC Chairman before a Congressional committee and the Committee Chairman’s comments.  At the time Chairman Schapiro had asked the SEC staff to take a “fresh look” at the offering rules.  The next chapter appears to have now begun with the Chairman’s formation of an Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies on Sept. 13, 2011.

With this new committee, the SEC is seeking input on capital raising efforts by both private companies and publicly traded companies with less than $250 million public market capitalization.  According to the SEC’s notice regarding the committee (PDF), its objective is to provide advice on rules, regulations, and policies with respect to protecting investors, maintaining markets, and facilitating capital formation as they relate to (1) capital raising by this group of companies, (2) trading in the securities of private companies and small public companies, and (3) the related public reporting and corporate governance requirements.  The SEC is also seeking public comment.

A Reuters report pointed to the issues raised by online private exchanges and efforts to avoid the 500-shareholder threshold as spotlighting the need to examine capital formation rules.  That article also pointed to a House subcommittee, which was schedule to hold hearing on Sept. 15, 2011 to explore “crowd funding.”  The crowd funding concept, which more often has been associated outside of the investment area, has gained traction recently as a mechanism for investors to pool resources, taking small stakes in private companies.  It raises a number of issues under the existing private offering rules and investor protections statutes and regulations.

The 20-member committee will be composed of private sector business representatives, attorneys, and representatives of institutional investors such as retirement funds.

The SEC also disclosed that it is in the process of re-establishing an Investor Advisory Committee, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

OUR TAKE:  The SEC will have to tackle how to modernize capital formation rules for the Internet age while still adequately addressing investor protection, the SEC’s original mandate.  Advocates point to the potential for significant new job creation if rules are better designed to facilitate capital formation, while detractors point to the real potential for fraud and harm to small investors.

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top