Blogs

SEC Proposes Rule to Readopt Beneficial Ownership Reporting Requirements on Security-Based Swaps

03.25.11

The SEC recently (Mar. 17, 2011) proposed a rule on beneficial ownership reporting requirements and security based swaps (PDF).  According to its summary, the rule is intended to preserve the application of the SEC’s existing beneficial ownership rules to persons who purchase or sell security-based swaps after the effective date of new Section 13(o) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 

The SEC proposes to readopt without change the relevant portions of Rules 13d-3 and 16a-1, as such proposals, “are intended to clarify that following the July 16, 2011 statutory effective date of Section 13(o), which was added by Section 766 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”), persons who purchase or sell security-based swaps will remain within the scope of these rules to the same extent as they are now.”

Comments should be received on or before April 15, 2011.

OUR TAKE:  The proposed rule is necessary to preserve the existing scope of the SEC’s rules relating to beneficial ownership after Section 766 of the Dodd-Frank Act becomes effective.  Substantive changes will likely follow however, as the SEC continues efforts to modernize reporting under Exchange Act Sections 13(d) and 13(g).   

The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top