Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code governs deferred compensation arrangements and requires such arrangements to comply with very specific rules to avoid the imposition of additional taxes (at the rate of 20%), interest and penalties on the deferred compensation payable to covered employees and other service providers. With certain exceptions described briefly below, compensation arrangements providing for severance payments, such as severance agreements or policies, employment agreements and change-in-control agreements, are subject to Section 409A of the Code.
The IRS takes the position that the timing of the payment of Section 409A covered severance benefits based upon when the employee signs a release or other required agreement is a Section 409A violation. The IRS has issued guidance (Notice 2010-80) that provides transition relief by permitting employers to correct certain documents that condition payment upon employee action, such as execution of a release or other agreement by the employee and the timing of the payment is based on the date the employee executes the release or other agreement, provided the correction is made no later than Dec. 31, 2012.
If severance benefits are treated as deferred compensation for Section 409A purposes, there are two alternatives for correcting impermissible provisions relating to severance benefits and releases under Notice 2010-80. In each case below, it is assumed that the required employee action (execution of a release or other agreement) has been completed prior to the payment and, if applicable, the revocation period has expired.
For example, a compliant employment agreement might provide language similar to the following: Severance payments shall be conditioned upon the execution, non-revocation and delivery of a release agreement substantially in the form attached to this agreement by the employee within 60 days of the date the employee separates from the service of the employer. The severance payments shall be made (or shall commence) to the employee on the 60th day following the employee's separation from service, provided the company has received a properly executed release by the employee during the 60-day period and the revocation period during which the employee is entitled to revoke such release has expired on or prior to the 60th day following the employee's separation from service. If the employee fails to properly execute and deliver the release (or the revocation period has not expired during the 60-day period following the employee's separation from service), the employee agrees that he shall not be entitled to receive the severance payments.
Alternatively, the provision above could provide that the severance payments will be made (or, if applicable, will commence) within 90 days following employee's separation from service as determined by the company, provided the employee executes the release and the revocation period expires during the period and if the 90-day period spans two calendar years, payment must be made in all cases in the second calendar year regardless of when the employee executes the release.
There are two general exemptions for severance arrangements under Section 409A of the Code. One exemption applies to arrangements under which the severance is required to be paid on or before March 15 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the employee's right to the severance payment ceases to be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (generally referred to as the short-term deferral rule). In general, a severance payment will be subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture until an employee's termination of employment if the agreement provides that payment will be made only if the employee is terminated involuntarily by the employer without cause (or for certain "good reason" terminations by the employee). The other exception generally applies to arrangements under which severance is only payable on account of the employee's involuntary termination (and certain "good reason" terminations), the severance will be paid no later than the last day of the second calendar year following the calendar year in which the employee's termination occurs and the severance amount does not exceed two times the lesser of the employee's current annual compensation or an amount described in the Code that is indexed annually ($250,000 for 2012). If one of these exceptions applies, the arrangement likely would not have to be amended to comply with IRS Notice 2010-80.
If an employer intends to rely on the special transition relief offered under IRS Notice 2010-80, the employer must take reasonable efforts to identify all deferred compensation arrangements subject to Section 409A of the Code that provide for payment of compensation contingent on employee action and correct such arrangements by amending the governing documents to include one of the two alternative payment provisions described above by Dec. 31, 2012. In addition, IRS notice 2010-80 requires the employer to notify the IRS of all corrections made by attaching a statement to its federal income tax return for its tax year in which the correction is made (the affected employees are not required to provide notice to the IRS regarding the correction of their compensation arrangements if the corrections are made by Dec. 31, 2012).
Compliance with the Section 409A rules not only avoids additional taxes, interest and penalties on the employee (or other service provider), but also permits the recipient of the compensation payment to defer the taxation of the payment to the date or dates on which the compensation is paid (rather than the date on which the recipient's right to the compensation becomes vested).
Employers should review all deferred compensation arrangements, especially employment agreements, severance agreements and change-in-control agreements that require employees to execute a release of claims, non-compete agreement or non-solicitation agreement, determine if the agreements are subject to Section 409A of the Code, and amend the agreements as needed in a manner consistent with IRS Notice 2010-80 to eliminate any issues with respect to the compensation timing relating to the employees' actions, such as the timing of the execution of a release.
For additional information, please contact any of the attorneys in Gardere's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.