Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
In a July 24, 2012 order in the Apple Inc. patent infringement case against Samsung Electronics Co., a U.S. magistrate judge in California ruled that Samsung admitted it was on notice that Apple would file a patent infringement lawsuit in August 2010, but Samsung did not institute a litigation hold notice. As a result, Samsung's automatic deletion of emails continued until April 2011 when Apple actually filed the lawsuit. Apple is seeking damages of more than $2.5 billion, and at trial, the jury will be given an adverse inference instruction that the reason that Samsung did not retain the emails was that they were adverse to Samsung's case.
It goes without saying that eDiscovery has changed litigation forever and is part of every lawsuit. It is estimated that every day there are over 350 billion emails and since everyone carries a smartphone that receives emails, we now operate all businesses using electronic information. Also there are estimates that more than 99 percent of all information is electronic.
What does that mean to you? First, you cannot save everything forever since there are natural limits on the cost of storage on disks and tapes, and many of the 350 billion emails are spam which no one wants and must be deleted by some means.
Managing electronically stored information (which is the way the federal rules of civil procedure now define this category of information) is a necessity for every business today for a number of reasons. One good reason is that the records retention policy helps establish for your employees how long to keep records and allows the destruction of certain items that no longer have business value. As a result, some individuals call these policies records destruction policies, since the policy allows an excuse to delete records.
But, the best reason to have a records retention policy is that if you are drawn into litigation and the other party claims that you wrongfully deleted ESI, you probably will be protected if the destruction of that ESI was in accord with the records retention policy. On the other hand, if you have a records retention policy and do not follow it, you run the risk that a judge will conclude that you intentionally destroyed the ESI.
When you decide you want to sue somebody, you should issue a litigation hold notice to protect the ESI of the employees who may relate to the lawsuit even though you are the plaintiff. Likewise, when you receive an indication that you might be sued, you should issue a litigation hold notice to protect the ESI. In both circumstances, you should formally change your records retention policy to preclude the destruction of ESI.
For additional information or to discuss any issues regarding records retention policies and litigation holds, please contact Trial Partner Peter S. Vogel, chair of Gardere's Electronic Discovery and Document Retention Practice, (email@example.com or 214.999.4422). Please also feel free to contact Trial Partners Mark W. Bayer (firstname.lastname@example.org or 214.999.4521) and Craig Florence (email@example.com or 214.999.4796).
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.