Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
At a hearing held before the House Committee on County Affairs in August 2010, representatives of the statewide County Judges and Commissioners' Association of Texas and the Texas Conference of Urban Counties, together with other county representatives, reaffirmed their intention to seek additional regulatory authority over building standards, residential development and land-use controls in the upcoming 82nd session of the Texas Legislature.
The Texas Legislature begins its 140-day regular session on Jan. 11, 2011. However, legislative committees and interest groups have already begun working on this and other issues for next session.
Developers and builders who are contemplating construction projects in the unincorporated portions of a county are urged to monitor carefully the legislation which these associations of counties will be supporting in the 2011 Legislative Session and, as made clear below, those with projects in the Texas Hill Country need to pay particular attention to the legislative efforts of the Hill Country Coalition of Counties, which began in the last legislative session.
In 2009, the statewide county associations supported the passage into law of House Bill No. 2833, which provided Texas counties with the authority to adopt the International Residential Code or other, similar building codes to govern single-family and residential duplex construction in the unincorporated areas of a county. This legislation, which for the first time provided counties with such direct regulatory control over building standards in the unincorporated areas of a county, also added provisions requiring sometimes costly inspections at various stages of any residential construction project.
At the August hearing, county associations' representatives confirmed their intention to seek stronger penalties for "substandard" residential construction within the unincorporated portion of a county which had adopted the IRC pursuant to the provisions of H.B. No. 2833 and indicated their intention to seek additional legislation to give counties regulatory control over such items as road construction, incompatible land uses and "buffer zone" authority. Providing counties with the additional authority to levy impact fees on developers, particularly to pay for road construction within the unincorporated portions of a county, was also supported by county representatives at the hearing.
Additionally, several representatives of a coalition of 15 Texas Hill Country counties testified at the hearing and reaffirmed their intention to continue to seek legislation which would give those counties even more robust authority on a whole range of land-use issues. That coalition had supported the passage of H.B. No. 3265, filed by State Rep. Patrick Rose (D-Drippings Springs) in the 2009 legislative session. That bill had been favorably approved by the County Affairs Committee but was not passed by the full State House of Representatives or directly considered by the Texas State Senate. Representatives of the Hill Country Coalition of Counties – originally consisting of Bandera, Blanco, Burnet, Comal, Edwards, Gillespie, Hays, Kendall, Kerr, Kimble, Llano, Mason, Medina, Real and Uvalde counties – made clear their intention to again seek legislation similar to the provisions of H.B. No. 3265 in 2011.
If you have questions related to the information contained in this alert or governmental relations advocacy, please contact Partner Arthur Val Perkins (email@example.com or 713.276.5008) or any other member of the Gardere Government Affairs Team.
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.