Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
The well-publicized battle between the National Basketball Association and Donald Sterling recently, and predictably, found its way into court. Late last month, Mr. Sterling filed suit against the NBA in the Central District of California, seeking over $1 billion in damages arising out of the NBA’s decision to ban Mr. Sterling from all NBA activities, fine him $2.5 million and, importantly, force him to sell the Los Angeles Clippers. While most of Mr. Sterling’s lawsuit centered around the propriety of the secret recording which precipitated the entire episode, he also made a claim that the NBA violated Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act by forcing him to sell his team.
Mr. Sterling alleged that the NBA and the owners of the other 29 franchises have made a “collective decision” to force the sale of the Clippers and, in so doing, deprived Mr. Sterling of his “guaranteed” right to determine whether to retain or sell his team. He further alleged that the forced sale threatened to produce a lower price for the Clippers and involved the “unfettered subjective discretion of Sterling’s direct competitors who each stand to gain financially from Sterling’s exclusion from the market.”
On June 4, Mr. Sterling announced that he would not challenge the sale, and would be dropping his lawsuit. The weakness of Mr. Sterling’s anti-trust claims no doubt played some part in his capitulation. For example, Mr. Sterling is not the actual owner of the Clippers, who are owned by the Sterling Family Trust (of which Mr. Sterling is co-trustee), which raised an immediate hurdle for Mr. Sterling’s anti-trust claim, as he may have lacked standing. Further, the “injury,” if any, would presumably have been suffered by the actual Clippers franchise, as opposed to beneficiaries several steps removed. What’s more, it is difficult to see how any injury could have been proven when the franchise sold for $2 billion, almost four times the previous high for an NBA franchise, set just a few weeks ago when the Milwaukee Bucks sold for $550 million.
In the end this case will still prove to be noteworthy, as antitrust cases involving major sports associations often are, for the fact that an “insider” breached, even if momentarily, the antitrust glaze covering our nation’s most popular monopolies. Indeed, it was an antitrust lawsuit by legendary basketball player Oscar Robertson, and the ensuing injunction temporarily stopping the NBA-ABA merger in the 1970s, that led to the modern-day NBA draft and free agency.
For additional information or to discuss any issues regarding antitrust law, please contact Gardere Attorneys Randy D. Gordon (firstname.lastname@example.org or 214.999.4527), Mark W. Bayer (email@example.com or 214.999.4521) or Thomas Haskins (firstname.lastname@example.org or 214.999.4014).
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.