Businesses of all types and sizes throughout the United States, Mexico and beyond bring their disputes to Gardere's litigation team and receive practical, responsive, boutique-style attention in return. Our clients have access to the firepower and value of a well-known and highly-regarded Firm's capabilities and interdisciplinary strengths.
Gardere has a national and international energy practice formed around our Energy Industry Team, which is a multidisciplinary group of approximately 60 attorneys with diverse backgrounds, experience and skills specific to the energy industry. Our team includes attorneys who have served as in-house counsel for major energy companies, providing a depth of insight into our clients' needs, issues and concerns. We understand and regularly practice in virtually every sector of the energy, and we represent a wide variety of industry participants from multinational corporations to individuals.
From our offices in the United States and Mexico, our International Practice helps clients operate in today’s global economy. We have more than 30 professionals operating as a boutique within an Am Law 200 law firm and are able to provide focused service with the resources of a large firm. We understand that clients who are engaged in the global marketplace need lawyers who can operate seamlessly across multiple jurisdictions. Our international experts are multi-lingual, are culturally fluent and intimately familiar with various legal systems across the world, especially those in Latin America. Whether you need help with commercial transactions, regulatory matters, customs and import regulations, immigration matters, M&A and joint ventures, international disputes, or international tax planning, Gardere’s international team is here to assist you.
We represent domestic and foreign private funds in all aspects of fund formation, fund operations, platform and add-on acquisitions, and portfolio company operations. Our team has a reputation for being the go-to-lawyers for private equity funds, hedge funds, venture capital funds and family offices. We are known for our vast deal experience, the efficient way we staff and manage our work, and the way we maintain our relationships. We get deals done with sophisticated, strategic, and practical advice tailored to the needs of our clients.
*Not admitted to practice law.
While Texas drilling and service companies have seen their fair share of woes with the recent drop in oil prices, plaintiffs’ attorneys in the state now have them in their sights as well. Recently, plaintiffs’ firms have filed lawsuits in the federal district courts in Texas on behalf of a purported classes of individuals against their former employers, pursuant to the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN”). Generally, these lawsuits allege that the employer failed to meets its obligations under WARN by giving 60 days advance written notice to plaintiffs and other employees before stacking rigs or laying off employees at or near field offices.
WARN applies to employers of 100 or more employees and is intended to provide protection to workers and their communities by requiring employers to provide advance notice of covered plant closings and mass layoffs. A permanent or temporary shutdown of an entire single site of employment is a “plant closing” covered by WARN if it results in an employment loss during any 30-day period for 50 or more employees (excluding part-time employees). And a reduction in force is a “mass layoff” covered by WARN if it results in the employment loss at a single site of employment in any 30-day period for: (1) at least 33 percent of the employees and at least 50 employees (excluding part-time employees), or (2) at least 500 employees (excluding any part-time employees).
While the application of WARN sounds fairly straight-forward, the concept of a “single site of employment” is difficult to apply in the case of a drilling company with its employees spread out across several rigs in a region. Specifically, the question is whether two or more non-contiguous rigs in a region constitutes a “single site of employment” for WARN purposes. The WARN regulations specify that when an employee is out-stationed or has primary duties that are not on the employers’ property, an employee’s site of employment is (1) the employee’s home base, (2) the place from which their work is assigned, or (3) the place where they report to work. So far, no Texas court has issued an opinion on the applicability of WARN to a drilling company with workers on multiple rigs in a region. Thus, the lawsuits recently filed against drilling companies under WARN may serve as test cases for other similar claims in the future.
To make matters worse, plaintiffs’ attorneys in Texas may also turn their gaze to other sections of the oil and gas industry where companies have instituted layoffs or closed facilities in recent months. If your company has been served with a lawsuit of this nature already, you have only a certain number of days to respond to the lawsuit. You should therefore seek legal assistance as soon as possible.
If you need assistance navigating these issues, please contact Gardere Labor and Employment Attorneys Rachel Powitzky Steely (email@example.com; 713.276.5605) and Taylor E. White (firstname.lastname@example.org; 214.999.4992).
The publications contained in this site do not constitute legal advice. Legal advice can only be given with knowledge of the client's specific facts. By putting these publications on our website we do not intend to create a lawyer-client relationship with the user. Materials may not reflect the most current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. This information should in no way be taken as an indication of future results.
You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander. A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.
Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used. For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.
AND and OR may be used in a search. Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance."
The + and - sign operators may be used. The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".
To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks. For example, "Project Finance".
Searches are not case sensitive.